Oral & Poster Competition Information

Post Session -Evaluation form

Judging Guidelines: 1=Strongly Disagree to 10=Strongly agree.

Please consider the educational level of each participant: undergraduates should be assessed on their basic understanding and communication skills, while graduates should be evaluated on their in-depth understanding, novelty, and advanced knowledge.

1. Technical Content: The concept demonstrates practical workability, economic feasibility, societal desirability, and novelty or innovation.
2. Hypothesis and Scope: Clear rationale, with a balanced presentation of technical details and relevant supporting data.
3. Visual Appeal: The content is grammatically correct, accessible, and enjoyable to read, with high-quality, well-sized graphics, effective color use, and a smooth flow of information.
4. Communication of Presenter: Engages the audience through eye contact and dynamic delivery, adapts style and content as needed, maintains a converstaional tone, and demonstrates strong knowledge.
5. Engagement and Responsiveness: The presenter maintained my interest, kept me engaged throughout the presentation, and answered all questions accurately and confidently.

Other feedback:

Thank you for participating as a poster presenter at IBEC!