AIAA Engine Design Team

miniDragon-950

Project

  • Background
    • The purpose was to create a gas turbine generator for a hybrid electric UAV that performs better than the existing TPE331-10
  • Cycle
    • The miniDragon-950 produces 949 horsepower with a Brake Specific Fuel Consumption of 0.33
    • Improvements were made through the use of more compressor and turbine stages and the addition of a recuperator
    • The largest improvement was the reduction of weight from 385 lbs to 148 lbs
  • Configuration: 3-stage centrifugal compressor
    • Allows for a wide range of pressure ratios at similar efficiencies
    • Provides a sufficiently wide operational envelope to allow for varied flight speeds and altitudes
    • Is light and compact relative to a comparable axial-flow compressor
  • Design Process
    • Used AxSTREAM (commercial software) to perform initial design at specified design condition, focused on minimizing required power input for a given
    • Two- and three-stage centrifugal compressor configurations were explored, the three-stage configuration is more efficient than the two- stage; axial-flow configurations were not considered due to weight and size
    • Created a 1D mean line analysis tool in Python to estimate the performance characteristics of the compressor at off-design conditions
Parameter Target Design Value Value
Engine Type Single Spool Single Spool
Maximum power at sea level 950-1050 shp 949 shp
Brake specific fuel consumption < 0.4005 0.33
Fuel burn at loiter < 0.0572 lbm/s 0.0643 lbm/s
Max. envelope diameter < 27" 20"
Max. envelope length < 55" 30"
Dry weight < 350 lbm 148lbm

Compressor and Inlet

  • Configuration: 3-stage centrifugal compressor
    • Allows for a wide range of pressure ratios at similar efficiencies
    • Provides a sufficiently wide operational envelope to allow for varied flight speeds and altitudes
    • Is light and compact relative to a comparable axial-flow compressor
  • Design Process
    • Used AxSTREAM (commercial software) to perform initial design at specified design condition, focused on minimizing required power input for a given
    • Two- and three-stage centrifugal compressor configurations were explored, the three-stage configuration is more efficient than the two- stage; axial-flow configurations were not considered due to weight and size
    • Created a 1D mean line analysis tool in Python to estimate the performance characteristics of the compressor at off-design conditions
Objects at the micron level graph graph

Combustor

  • configuration
    • The combustor is the heat addition portion of the power cycle, its purpose is to add as much energy to the system as other constraints allow
    • Reverse annular combustor geometry allows low pressure losses and maximizes total combustion volume per unit length
  • Technology
    • Twin Annular Premixing Swirler technology (TAPS) will minimize harmful emissions and ensure the most efficient combustion
    • Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMC) for the combustor liner will allow high combustion temperatures. CMC materials also provide a 60% weight savings over alternative super-alloys
    • Additional liner cooling will come through angled effusion cooling. This method maximizes cooling surfaces while minimizing the internal airflow disruption
    Figure 5. Emissions Comparison Plot Figure 5. Emissions Comparison Plot

    Turbine

    Figure 7. Turbine CAD Model
    Parameter Value
    Power 1799 shp
    Efficiency 0.8997
    Average isentropic Velocity ratio 0.5761
    Average Flow coefficient 0.6288
    Average work coefficient 1.50663
    • Configuration: 5-stage axial turbine
      • Maximum efficiency occurs when the fluid does not swirl through the turbine section
      • Constructed with Silicon Carbide composite this material has high heat tolerance, great strength, and durability, and is light weight
    • Design Process
      • AxSTREAM modeling software was used to determine the most efficient configurations for maximum power output
    Figure 8. Pressure Drop Across Turbine