AIAA Engine Design Team
miniDragon-950
Project
- Background
- The purpose was to create a gas turbine generator for a hybrid electric UAV that performs better than the existing TPE331-10
- Cycle
- The miniDragon-950 produces 949 horsepower with a Brake Specific Fuel Consumption of 0.33
- Improvements were made through the use of more compressor and turbine stages and the addition of a recuperator
- The largest improvement was the reduction of weight from 385 lbs to 148 lbs
- Configuration: 3-stage centrifugal compressor
- Allows for a wide range of pressure ratios at similar efficiencies
- Provides a sufficiently wide operational envelope to allow for varied flight speeds and altitudes
- Is light and compact relative to a comparable axial-flow compressor
- Design Process
- Used AxSTREAM (commercial software) to perform initial design at specified design condition, focused on minimizing required power input for a given
- Two- and three-stage centrifugal compressor configurations were explored, the three-stage configuration is more efficient than the two- stage; axial-flow configurations were not considered due to weight and size
- Created a 1D mean line analysis tool in Python to estimate the performance characteristics of the compressor at off-design conditions
Parameter | Target Design Value | Value |
Engine Type | Single Spool | Single Spool |
Maximum power at sea level | 950-1050 shp | 949 shp |
Brake specific fuel consumption | < 0.4005 | 0.33 |
Fuel burn at loiter | < 0.0572 lbm/s | 0.0643 lbm/s |
Max. envelope diameter | < 27" | 20" |
Max. envelope length | < 55" | 30" |
Dry weight | < 350 lbm | 148lbm |
Compressor and Inlet
- Configuration: 3-stage centrifugal compressor
- Allows for a wide range of pressure ratios at similar efficiencies
- Provides a sufficiently wide operational envelope to allow for varied flight speeds and altitudes
- Is light and compact relative to a comparable axial-flow compressor
- Design Process
- Used AxSTREAM (commercial software) to perform initial design at specified design condition, focused on minimizing required power input for a given
- Two- and three-stage centrifugal compressor configurations were explored, the three-stage configuration is more efficient than the two- stage; axial-flow configurations were not considered due to weight and size
- Created a 1D mean line analysis tool in Python to estimate the performance characteristics of the compressor at off-design conditions
Combustor
- configuration
- The combustor is the heat addition portion of the power cycle, its purpose is to add as much energy to the system as other constraints allow
- Reverse annular combustor geometry allows low pressure losses and maximizes total combustion volume per unit length
- Technology
- Twin Annular Premixing Swirler technology (TAPS) will minimize harmful emissions and ensure the most efficient combustion
- Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMC) for the combustor liner will allow high combustion temperatures. CMC materials also provide a 60% weight savings over alternative super-alloys
- Additional liner cooling will come through angled effusion cooling. This method maximizes cooling surfaces while minimizing the internal airflow disruption
Turbine
Parameter | Value |
Power | 1799 shp |
Efficiency | 0.8997 |
Average isentropic Velocity ratio | 0.5761 |
Average Flow coefficient | 0.6288 |
Average work coefficient | 1.50663 |
- Configuration: 5-stage axial turbine
- Maximum efficiency occurs when the fluid does not swirl through the turbine section
- Constructed with Silicon Carbide composite this material has high heat tolerance, great strength, and durability, and is light weight
- Design Process
- AxSTREAM modeling software was used to determine the most efficient configurations for maximum power output