Canyon Cottages Subdivision

Team: Koy Barton, Luke DeBernardi, Zane DeBernardi, Nicholas Hill, Cade Jensen, Kipp Zubeck

Sponsor: In Site Engineering

Aerial view of the project area

Figure 1 - Aerial view of the project area

Introduction

Mountain West Engineering was approached by Jeff Jorgensen in March of 2022 and was asked to design a subdivision near Bear Lake in Garden City, Utah. The purpose of the subdivision was to build smaller homes that would serve as rental properties. The subdivision was to be built on an undeveloped 12-acre lot owned by the client. Mountain West Engineering was asked to provide the design and orientation of the road for the subdivision, route all sewer and water, as well as provide adequate drainage and catches for the area. Mountain West Engineering was not asked to provide designs for the homes or any surrounding roadways.

Building of the Canyon Cottages Subdivision would be beneficial for the town of Garden City by bringing in more tourists which could improve the local economy and boost the city’s revenue.

Design Factors Weight (%) Asphalt Cul-de-sac Concrete Cul-de-sac Through Street Larger Lots Do Nothing
Number of lots 15 % 14 2.1 14 2.1 14 2.1 9 1.35 0 0
Size of lots (0-5) 10 % 2 0.2 2 0.2 2 0.2 4 0.4 0 0
Ease of access (0-5) 5 % 3 0.15 3 0.15 5 0.25 3 0.15 1 0.05
Environmental inpact (0-5) 5 % 5 -0.25 4 -0.2 4 -0.2 3 -0.15 0 0
Ease of Drainage (0-5) 10 % 5 0.5 5 0.5 3 0.3 5 0.5 5 0.5
Ease of Construction (0-5) 5 % 3 0.15 4 0.2 2 0.1 3 0.15 5 0.25
Ease of Maintenance (0-5) 5 % 3 0.15 3 0.15 4 0.2 3 0.15 5 0.25
Noise (0-5) 5 % 3 -0.15 4 -0.2 4 -0.2 3 -0.15 0 0
Aesthetics (0-5) 5 % 4 0.2 3 0.15 3 0.15 5 0.25 5 0.25
Profitability (0-5) 15 % 5 0.75 5 0.75 4 0.6 2 0.3 1 0.15
Overall cost (0-5) 20 % 3 -0.6 4 -0.8 5 -1 3 -0.6 0 0
Total 100 % Score 3.2 Score 3 Score 2.5 Score 2.35 Score 1.45

Figure 2 - Pugh matrix used to evaluate alternmative

Alternatives

The following alternatives were evaluated for the design of Canyon Cottages Subdivision

  • Alternative 1: Cul-de-sac
  • Alternative 2: Through Street
  • Alternative 3: Less Lots, Larger acreage per Lot
  • Alternative 4: Do Nothing

The criteria used for evaluation included number of lots, size of lots, ease of access, environmental impact, ease of drainage, ease of construction, ease of maintenance, noise, aesthetics, and profitability. Of the established criteria, number of lots, size of lots, profitability, and overall cost were weighted the heaviest. The alternatives were scored individually and compared against each other. The pugh matrix used for evaluation can be found in Figure 2.

Final cul-de-sac and lot design

Figure 3 - Final cul-de-sac and lot design

Final Design

After evaluating the different alternatives we determined that a pavement cul-de-sac was the best option. The final design includes:

  • (12) 0.23 Acre lots
  • 104,625 ft3 Clear and grub
  • 24’ Roadway with (2) 12’ lanes
  • 20,908 ft2 3” Asphalt
  • 524 T 6” Road base
  • 4’ Shoulders each side of roadway
  • 14,800 ft3 Drainage basin
  • (6) Storm drain boxes with grates
  • 437’ 15” Drainage pipeline
  • 1,372’ of 6” Water pipeline
  • 1,361’ 8” Sewer pipeline

The final cost is $498,524 at $41,544 per lot.

Utility plan that includes the layout for water and sewer lines

Figure 4 - Utility plan that includes the layout for water and sewer lines

Roadway cross section

Figure 5 - Roadway cross section

Acknowledgments

Mountain West Engineering would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions to the project:

  • Jeff Jorgensen, Jorgensen Development
  • Scott Worthington, Insite Engineering
  • Austin Ball, Utah State University